What lead scoring actually solves

Without a shared definition of a 'good' lead, sales often distrusts marketing-sourced leads and marketing has no clear feedback on lead quality. Lead scoring assigns points based on fit and behaviour so both teams work from the same definition.

Fit criteria vs behavioural criteria

Fit criteria (company size, industry, job title) indicate whether a lead matches your ideal customer profile; behavioural criteria (pages visited, content downloaded, email engagement) indicate how close they are to being ready to buy. Both matter.

Start simple before building something complex

A basic point system across five or six clear criteria, reviewed and adjusted monthly, tends to outperform an overly complex model built before there's enough data to calibrate it properly.

Scoring only works if sales and marketing agree on the threshold

The score at which a lead gets passed to sales needs to be a jointly agreed number, revisited periodically — a threshold set unilaterally by marketing rarely survives contact with a skeptical sales team.

Review and recalibrate regularly

As your product, market or sales process changes, the scoring model needs to be revisited — a model that made sense a year ago can quietly misclassify leads if left untouched.

Related service

B2B Marketing

Demand generation built for long sales cycles and committee decisions.

Explore B2B Marketing

Start a conversation

Want this applied to your business?

Tell us about your business and goals. We'll map out where the fastest, most durable wins are — no jargon, no pressure.

Start a Project